Say for example, if only all the global training big data up to before the date of invention of Heliocentrism is fed into it, the ChatGPT tool will only answer all questions related to astronomy based only on the good old but wrong model of Geocentrism, and so will be very misleading to all the astronomy-related users of this chat tool.

Unless another breakthrough AI version of 'ChatGPT-data-input' can soon be invented to persistently feed all the latest global (training) big data to the latest model of ChatGPT in real time (or, at most with a lag of only say a day), the world's latest available ChatGPT AI tool can only be as good, clever, and human-thinking-like as the latest global training big data fed into it. On the other hand, they have led to worker displacement, wage stagnation, greater inequality, and increasing concentration of resources among individuals and corporations. On one hand, they have bolstered economic productivity and income growth, expanded access to information and communication technologies, extended human lifespans, and improved overall well-being. Virtually all technological advances have had both positive and negative effects on society. Given that such systems hold the greatest promise and can lead to the most treacherous pitfalls, they merit particularly close scrutiny by public and private stakeholders. The window of opportunity for guiding the development of this powerful technology in ways that minimize the risks and maximize the benefits is closing fast.ĪI-based capabilities exist along a continuum, with generative AI systems such as GPT-4 (the latest version of ChatGPT) falling within the most advanced category. GENEVA – In recent months, the development of artificial intelligence has accelerated considerably, with generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney rapidly transforming a wide range of professional activities and creative processes.

The archived schwab